<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 68% Improvement in Just One Year</title>
	<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2006/12/06/68-improvement-in-just-one-year/</link>
	<description>The usability blog of John S. Rhodes</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mark van Zanten</title>
		<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2006/12/06/68-improvement-in-just-one-year/#comment-40002</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webword.com/wp/2006/12/06/68-improvement-in-just-one-year/#comment-40002</guid>
					<description>I really like your idea and the essence of your theory is right. I practise  this in running

But it is all about improve your productivity, by doing more in the same amount of time. But time is limited, so, for example, if you would like to write 68% more articles by the end of the year, that results in let's say 8 articles per week. 

This would be a great result, but it also means that you have to be 68% more productive. 

You probably have to add the time element in this idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like your idea and the essence of your theory is right. I practise  this in running</p>
<p>But it is all about improve your productivity, by doing more in the same amount of time. But time is limited, so, for example, if you would like to write 68% more articles by the end of the year, that results in let&#8217;s say 8 articles per week. </p>
<p>This would be a great result, but it also means that you have to be 68% more productive. </p>
<p>You probably have to add the time element in this idea.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
