<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s happens when the Google Operating System-Client-Platform is here?</title>
	<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2005/09/26/whats-happens-when-the-google-operating-system-client-platform-is-here/</link>
	<description>The usability blog of John S. Rhodes</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cornwallace</title>
		<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2005/09/26/whats-happens-when-the-google-operating-system-client-platform-is-here/#comment-11104</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webword.com/wp/2005/09/26/whats-happens-when-the-google-operating-system-client-platform-is-here/#comment-11104</guid>
					<description>Google is no threat to Microsoft. By and large, Google is only a search engine. That &quot;vast collection of web services&quot; you speak of is used by a niche minority of Google users.

Google has a history of launching tangential services and then letting them stagnate. People will demand better service and quality (besides just a great search engine) before they adopt a new god. 

When you call Microsoft you may have to pay for the call and sit on hold, but at least you eventually reach a real human being, and not some automated e-mail with a hollow claim that &quot;We read all of the email we receive and try to send personal responses to each message.&quot; Please. We're not stupid. Fool me once...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is no threat to Microsoft. By and large, Google is only a search engine. That &#8220;vast collection of web services&#8221; you speak of is used by a niche minority of Google users.</p>
<p>Google has a history of launching tangential services and then letting them stagnate. People will demand better service and quality (besides just a great search engine) before they adopt a new god. </p>
<p>When you call Microsoft you may have to pay for the call and sit on hold, but at least you eventually reach a real human being, and not some automated e-mail with a hollow claim that &#8220;We read all of the email we receive and try to send personal responses to each message.&#8221; Please. We&#8217;re not stupid. Fool me once&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: deeje</title>
		<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2005/09/26/whats-happens-when-the-google-operating-system-client-platform-is-here/#comment-11102</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webword.com/wp/2005/09/26/whats-happens-when-the-google-operating-system-client-platform-is-here/#comment-11102</guid>
					<description>I don't follow you either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t follow you either.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonas Beckeman</title>
		<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2005/09/26/whats-happens-when-the-google-operating-system-client-platform-is-here/#comment-11101</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webword.com/wp/2005/09/26/whats-happens-when-the-google-operating-system-client-platform-is-here/#comment-11101</guid>
					<description>Don't follow you. So because a program runs in a browser, there are no requirements on the browser/OS? .NET/Java can't be used to create those programs? Why would Google be the only remote-desktop provider (many such technologies already exist)? Will Google provide all programs that any user may need? Am I totally misreading you?
And sure, software distribution and execution models will change in the coming years, but I can't see the reason Google is the apparent center of this evolution. Sun, for one, has been working in this direction for many years. Google and many others might grab a slice of the pie, or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t follow you. So because a program runs in a browser, there are no requirements on the browser/OS? .NET/Java can&#8217;t be used to create those programs? Why would Google be the only remote-desktop provider (many such technologies already exist)? Will Google provide all programs that any user may need? Am I totally misreading you?<br />
And sure, software distribution and execution models will change in the coming years, but I can&#8217;t see the reason Google is the apparent center of this evolution. Sun, for one, has been working in this direction for many years. Google and many others might grab a slice of the pie, or not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
