<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Persona Non Grata</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webword.com/wp/2005/08/18/persona-non-grata/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2005/08/18/persona-non-grata/</link>
	<description>The usability blog of John S. Rhodes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Portigal</title>
		<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2005/08/18/persona-non-grata/comment-page-1/#comment-11023</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Portigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webword.com/2005/08/18/persona-non-grata/#comment-11023</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only used them when &quot;forced&quot; to; mostly I&#039;ve seen them misused. Created to represent what we think people are like, or as a club used by marketers to reject any findings outside their predefined customer (&quot;Well, then they aren&#039;t a Server Sam&quot;).

My favorite line was &quot; For some, they form an artificial barrier between the designer’s product and its users. &quot; True, true, true. The stock photo with the dumb-ass name (Mobile Mike, Cash-and-Carry Kerry) that find their way into everyday conversation are not about designing for people, but for caricatures. 

I think the real world is too messy - in every sense - for some types of people - and it&#039;s scary and hard to filter, so cleaning things up with a fresh and lovely persona is a way to eliminate some of that fear. 

Thanks for the alert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only used them when &#8220;forced&#8221; to; mostly I&#8217;ve seen them misused. Created to represent what we think people are like, or as a club used by marketers to reject any findings outside their predefined customer (&#8220;Well, then they aren&#8217;t a Server Sam&#8221;).</p>
<p>My favorite line was &#8221; For some, they form an artificial barrier between the designer’s product and its users. &#8221; True, true, true. The stock photo with the dumb-ass name (Mobile Mike, Cash-and-Carry Kerry) that find their way into everyday conversation are not about designing for people, but for caricatures. </p>
<p>I think the real world is too messy &#8211; in every sense &#8211; for some types of people &#8211; and it&#8217;s scary and hard to filter, so cleaning things up with a fresh and lovely persona is a way to eliminate some of that fear. </p>
<p>Thanks for the alert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Zipursky</title>
		<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2005/08/18/persona-non-grata/comment-page-1/#comment-11017</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Zipursky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webword.com/2005/08/18/persona-non-grata/#comment-11017</guid>
		<description>I attended the latest UIE roadshow where Kim Goodwin from Cooper presented a 1-day seminar on Personas.  The biggest take-away was that the people creating the personas should be the same people that interviewed/observed the users in the first place.  &lt;b&gt;And&lt;/b&gt; those are the same people that will design the interface.

From that, I concluded that Personas are a tool to share the user research with the development team and other stakeholders, but don&#039;t and can&#039;t replace the designers&#039; deeper knowledge gained from doing the research in the first place.

That&#039;s the ideal case, anyway.  I&#039;m curious if others find them useful in situations where the researcher is different from the designer or if there are more effective methods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended the latest UIE roadshow where Kim Goodwin from Cooper presented a 1-day seminar on Personas.  The biggest take-away was that the people creating the personas should be the same people that interviewed/observed the users in the first place.  <b>And</b> those are the same people that will design the interface.</p>
<p>From that, I concluded that Personas are a tool to share the user research with the development team and other stakeholders, but don&#8217;t and can&#8217;t replace the designers&#8217; deeper knowledge gained from doing the research in the first place.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the ideal case, anyway.  I&#8217;m curious if others find them useful in situations where the researcher is different from the designer or if there are more effective methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

