http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/ The usability blog of John S. Rhodes Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:48:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3 http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/#comment-11757 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:24:46 +0000 http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/#comment-11757 2006 nfl mock draft <a href="http://draft.top65.org/" rel="nofollow">2006 nfl mock draft</a> 2006 nfl mock draft http://draft.top65.org 2006 nfl mock draft
2006 nfl mock draft
2006 nfl mock draft
http://draft.top65.org

]]> http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/#comment-8215 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/#comment-8215 Did anyone else notice that John Kerry mentioned <a href="http://www.johnkerry.com">JohnKerry.com</a>? It didn't seem to <a href="http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/ostentatious">ostentatious</a> to me. I wonder how much his traffic bumped up because of that plug. Did anyone else notice that John Kerry mentioned JohnKerry.com? It didn’t seem to ostentatious to me. I wonder how much his traffic bumped up because of that plug.

]]> http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/#comment-8216 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/#comment-8216 FYI: Red is designated for republicans, and blue is designated for democrats, not the other way around. Which just makes it stranger the choice in tie color each candidate made. FYI: Red is designated for republicans, and blue is designated for democrats, not the other way around. Which just makes it stranger the choice in tie color each candidate made.

]]> http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/#comment-8217 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/#comment-8217 To be honest I'm somewhat appalled at the choice of words for why they may have chosen to wear white (virginity???). I'm assuming it has something more to do with them trying to promote peace between the two parties after a heated debate. To be honest I’m somewhat appalled at the choice of words for why they may have chosen to wear white (virginity???). I’m assuming it has something more to do with them trying to promote peace between the two parties after a heated debate.

]]> http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/#comment-8218 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/#comment-8218 Virginity is not just about sex, if that is what upsets you. In a very generic sense, it simply means that something is pure. They could very well have pure intentions, or pure feelings. Nothing more was implied. Virginity is not just about sex, if that is what upsets you. In a very generic sense, it simply means that something is pure. They could very well have pure intentions, or pure feelings. Nothing more was implied.

]]> http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/#comment-8219 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/10/01/the-colors-of-the-candidates-2004-debate/#comment-8219 FYI you're wrong. I can never remember a time that republicans were red until 2000 when the media switched it on us. FYI you’re wrong. I can never remember a time that republicans were red until 2000 when the media switched it on us.

]]>