<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Micropayments</title>
	<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/06/28/micropayments/</link>
	<description>The usability blog of John S. Rhodes</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: JoshuaKaufman</title>
		<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/06/28/micropayments/#comment-5534</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/06/28/micropayments/#comment-5534</guid>
					<description>I imagine the credit cards you mentioned aren't in the micropayments game because it's too big of a risk right now.  Are people screaming for micropayments?  No.  Can credit cards make a lot of money from it?  No.  (What's the late payment on $2.00 worth of micropayments?)  For now, I think it's smart of them to stick to their core brand of giving people credit for big purchases, not micro ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine the credit cards you mentioned aren&#8217;t in the micropayments game because it&#8217;s too big of a risk right now.  Are people screaming for micropayments?  No.  Can credit cards make a lot of money from it?  No.  (What&#8217;s the late payment on $2.00 worth of micropayments?)  For now, I think it&#8217;s smart of them to stick to their core brand of giving people credit for big purchases, not micro ones.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/06/28/micropayments/#comment-5535</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/06/28/micropayments/#comment-5535</guid>
					<description>All the card companies have been in this space before....electronic cash, VisaCash and Mondex (from MasterCard) ....there is no business case for the payment schemes to push.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The banks don't want it...as they would be the ones that would have to sell and manage the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, if I can pay 0.99 for a song on iTunes with my credit card, the leap to 0.25 is not that big. Give me something compelling and I would be all over it.&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the card companies have been in this space before&#8230;.electronic cash, VisaCash and Mondex (from MasterCard) &#8230;.there is no business case for the payment schemes to push.</p>
<p>The banks don&#8217;t want it&#8230;as they would be the ones that would have to sell and manage the system.</p>
<p>Also, if I can pay 0.99 for a song on iTunes with my credit card, the leap to 0.25 is not that big. Give me something compelling and I would be all over it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mcw</title>
		<link>http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/06/28/micropayments/#comment-5536</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webword.com/wp/2004/06/28/micropayments/#comment-5536</guid>
					<description>Why don't credit card companies support micropayments?  Their return on the transaction is minimal.  Cost to process a transaction is roughly the same at $25.00, $250.00, or $0.25.  Revenue to the credit card company is usually a percent or two, so at sub $1.00 amounts it's not very interesting for them.  They would want/need too big a cut of the action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t credit card companies support micropayments?  Their return on the transaction is minimal.  Cost to process a transaction is roughly the same at $25.00, $250.00, or $0.25.  Revenue to the credit card company is usually a percent or two, so at sub $1.00 amounts it&#8217;s not very interesting for them.  They would want/need too big a cut of the action.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
