Previous entry: "19-September-2001 -- Companies Lack Sound Search Engine Strategies" WebWord Home Page Next entry: "19-September-2001 -- A Bigger Military Is Not the Solution to Terrorism"

09/19/2001 Archived Entry: "19-September-2001 -- What Not To Do"

What Not To Do -- "A war against terrorism, already begun in the 1980s and so far spectacularly unsuccessful, promises to be perpetual because of the endless number of conceivable threats. We’ll never know if we are winning or losing the war since something as monstrously huge as the recent attack could happen anytime." (Comments: This is exactly my concern. How will we know that we are done with the war? Do we really want a perpetual war? A country always at war? A warrior society? A fearful, watchful, always-on-guard society? I think I would rather be given a specific plan, with specific goals, and plenty of details. Then, let the military do their job. After that, start the peace. Start to rebuild. I don't want to support a never ending war. So, again, how will we know that we have won? That is my burning question. What is your burning question?)

Replies: 3 comments

You don't want a perpetual war, but you don't know how to tell if the war is over. Don't feel alone.

But you don't solve anything this way. Remember the song "One Tin Soldier"? The people of the Valley were peaceful. The people of the Mountain made war to get what the Valley people had. In the end, the Mountain people got nothing, because the Valley people's treasure was Love. BUT THE VALLEY PEOPLE WERE ALL KILLED.

If it were up to us, we wouldn't fight ANY war. But it takes two or more to make peace, only one to break it. If you can talk the terrorists into leaving us in peace, we won't have to fight a never-ending war. But that's where we are, now.

Facing reality, we must fight as best we can, or join the people of the Valley.

mkr

Posted by M. K. Roth @ 09/20/2001 03:38 PM EST

Duncil,

I don't think it really matters what the race of the person who has done this is. As the message goes "We are against terrorism not Islam (African-American, Native Americans, Jews, Christians, etc...)But don't get me wrong, it would do some good in preventing some of our own behaving like terrorists towards Muslim-Americans. Also, it would add to the list of "World's most wanted Terrorists" and we won't only stick with finding just one man in a cave.

I am not sure I understand your question about empathizing with their sense of frustration and anger? Are you posing this question to point out that some do not empathize with the frustration and anger of Islamic militants? Or to point out that anger could possibly justify the events of September 11th?

Posted by Berna @ 09/20/2001 10:47 AM EST

How would we feel were we to discover that African-Americans or Native Americans bombed the WTC? Upon reflection, would we not be able to empathize with their collective sense of frustration, disenfranchisement, anger?

Posted by Duncil @ 09/20/2001 09:23 AM EST

Home | Moving WebWord | Cool Books | Hot Web Sites
Newsletter Archive | Services | Interviews | About WebWord.com

Subscribe to Webword.com
Receive the best free usability newsletter on the Internet.

 


URL: http://www.WebWord.com/weblog/

©1998-2005 by WebWord.com. All rights reserved.
Do not reproduce or redistribute any material from this document,
in whole or in part, without explicit written permission from WebWord.com.